|
I-713, a measure banning trapping in Washington State, was presented to the voters in a manner that glossed over facts, played games with the truth and misled the voters in a number of ways. For example:
There are additional examples but these serve to illustrate the point that I-713 was poorly written and ill-conceived. The measure was not based on sound science nor thoughtful consideration. It was a boilerplate initiative based on political rhetoric imported into the state by national animal rights groups who poured a million dollars into the state against slightly over $410,000 spent fighting the measure by its opponents. And the citizens of the state are left holding the bag and bear the brunt of the impacts of the measure while those that paid for it have moved on to other states with their flawed political agenda. Nearly every major newspaper in the state, except for a small handful, advised their readers to "vote no" on the measure. Rural counties overwhelmingly voted against the measure while the King County/Seattle metroplex voted for the measure. The opponents to I-713 warned of potential public health and legal problems with the measure. Now, the state Public Health Department refuses to issue permits for disease control trapping and the Initiative is being challenged in court as illegal under the Washington State Constitution. We have organized information related to I-713 in this archive into eleven groups and links to each content area and major elements within each area are presented below. Each highlighted element (except those in blue) are active links to documents in our database. Initiative 713 Issues & Problems
Media Editorials & Related Articles
Statements in Opposition to I-713 Over 400 organizations, public opinion leaders, scientists, elected officials, wildlife management societies, organizations and professionals, former directors of fish and game and others opposed Initiative 713. the "Statements in Opposition to I-713 section of this archive presents a representative sample of statements issued against the measure during the course of the campaign. Wildlife management issues evoke strong feelings from all sides of a discussion and I-713 is no exception. The committee opposing the measure received numerous letters raising issues of concern, or making important points in opposition to the initiative, from all across Washington State. A representative cross-section of these letters is presented in this section of the archive. Please contact us if you are seeking specific information not included in this archive. Contact us | Email our Webmaster | Search
|